Comments on: Forbidden Archaeology? The Exaggeration of the Antiquity of Man -part 3- http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/forbidden-archaeology-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man-part-3/ Archaeology, anthropology, science, and skepticism Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:20:02 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: cfeagans http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/forbidden-archaeology-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man-part-3/#comment-271 cfeagans Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:11:22 +0000 http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/forbidden-archaeology-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man-part-3/#comment-271 900 years ago, hydrocephalus wasn't treatable as it is today. A child might live to 4 or 5 years old and then die -the resulting cranial remains, if preserved, would match, almost identically, the so-called "starchild" skull. No mystery. 900 years ago, hydrocephalus wasn’t treatable as it is today. A child might live to 4 or 5 years old and then die -the resulting cranial remains, if preserved, would match, almost identically, the so-called “starchild” skull.

No mystery.

]]> By: wand77 http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/forbidden-archaeology-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man-part-3/#comment-270 wand77 Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:05:18 +0000 http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/forbidden-archaeology-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man-part-3/#comment-270 what about the starchild skull? hoax? fabrication? what about the starchild skull?

hoax? fabrication?

]]>