Comments on: Forbidden Archaeology? Pseudo-archaeology and the Exaggeration of the Antiquity of Man http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/07/31/forbidden-archaeology-pseudo-archaeology-and-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man/ Archaeology, anthropology, science, and skepticism Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:20:02 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Jim Lowdermilk http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/07/31/forbidden-archaeology-pseudo-archaeology-and-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man/#comment-401 Jim Lowdermilk Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:39:48 +0000 http://ahotcupofjoe.wordpress.com/2006/07/31/forbidden-archaeology-pseudo-archaeology-and-the-exaggeration-of-the-antiquity-of-man/#comment-401 Mathematics is the study and description of patterns. Writing is not a prerequisite, it is only an aid for the descriptions. This will become apparent when my work is published. I do hope my work will not be used to support Brophy. From what I know of his work, it is interesting speculation, but it does not fit the archaeological record. If he could find a plausible explanation of how this galactic knowledge was attained then may be there could be some mainstream acceptance. Good luck.!. However, that is what I have done with precession. Mathematics is the study and description of patterns. Writing is not a prerequisite, it is only an aid for the descriptions. This will become apparent when my work is published.

I do hope my work will not be used to support Brophy. From what I know of his work, it is interesting speculation, but it does not fit the archaeological record. If he could find a plausible explanation of how this galactic knowledge was attained then may be there could be some mainstream acceptance. Good luck.!.

However, that is what I have done with precession.

]]>